Public Diplomacy by Korean Entities in Poland: Governmental and Corporate Actors, Soft Power, and Public Perception

Authors

  • Jacek Barlik University of Warsaw image/svg+xml Author
  • Maria Lisowska Student at University of Warsaw Author

Keywords:

public diplomacy, soft power, corporate diplomacy, South Korea, international public relations, Poland

Abstract

Public diplomacy has become a central instrument of contemporary international communication, increasingly shaped by non-state actors such as corporations, cultural institutions, and educational organizations. The Republic of Korea (South Korea) represents a particularly instructive case, as its public diplomacy strategy combines coordinated governmental action with the global presence of powerful multinational enterprises and the worldwide popularity of Korean popular culture.

This article examines South Korean public diplomacy activities in Poland, focusing on the role of governmental institutions and Korean businesses in shaping the country’s image among Polish publics. Drawing on the theoretical frameworks of soft power and new public diplomacy, the study employs quantitative survey data collected in Poland in 2024 (N = 901) to assess perceptions of Korea, its culture, economy, and international engagement.

The findings indicate that Korean companies function as highly visible and effective public diplomacy actors, significantly enhancing Korea’s economic and technological reputation, while official governmental initiatives remain comparatively less recognized by the wider public.

The article contributes to public relations and international communication scholarship by highlighting the growing importance of corporate diplomacy and market-based actors in state-led public diplomacy strategies, particularly in Central and Eastern Europe.

References

Ambasada Republiki Korei w Polsce. (n.d.). Stosunki dwustronne. Retrieved from https://overseas.mofa.go.kr/pl-pl/index.do

Anholt, S. (2007). Competitive identity: The new brand management for nations, cities and regions. Palgrave Macmillan.

Anholt, S., & Ipsos. (2023). The Anholt-Ipsos Nation Brands Index 2023. Retrieved from https://www.ipsos.com

Banks, R. (2020). Public diplomacy evaluation. In N. Snow & N. J. Cull (Eds.), Routledge Handbook of Public Diplomacy (2nd ed., pp. 64-76). Routledge.

Bially Mattern, J. (2005). Why “soft power” isn’t so soft: Representational force and the sociolinguistic construction of attraction in world politics. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 33(3), 583-612.

Brand Finance. (2024a). Global Soft Power Index 2024. Brand Finance.

Brand Finance. (2024b). Global Soft Power Index methodology. Brand Finance.

Choi, K. (2019). The Republic of Korea’s Public Diplomacy Strategy: History and Current Status. USC Center on Public Diplomacy.

Copeland, D., & Potter, E. H. (2008). Public diplomacy in conflict zones: Military information operations meet public diplomacy. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 3(3), 277-297.

Cull, N. J. (2008). Public diplomacy: Taxonomies and histories. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 31-54.

Cull, N. J. (2019). Public diplomacy: Foundations for global engagement in the digital age. Polity Press.

European Commission. (n.d.-a). EU-Korea relations. Retrieved from https://commission.europa.eu

Fan, Y. (2008). Soft power: Power of attraction or confusion? Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 4(2), 147-158.

Fan, Y. (2010). Branding the nation: Towards a better understanding. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy, 6(2), 97-103.

Gilboa, E. (2008). Searching for a theory of public diplomacy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 55-77.

Huijgh, E. (2016). Public diplomacy. In C. Carroll (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of corporate reputation (pp. 437-441). Sage.

Jin, D. Y. (2016). New Korean Wave: Transnational cultural power in the age of social media. University of Illinois Press.

L’Etang, J. (2009). Public relations and diplomacy in a globalized world: An issue of public communication. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(4), 607-626.

Lee, D., & Hocking, B. (2010). Economic diplomacy. In The International Studies Encyclopedia (pp. 1216-1227). Wiley-Blackwell.

Leonard, M., Stead, C., & Smewing, C. (2002). Public diplomacy. Foreign Policy Centre.

Li, J. (2016). Measuring soft power: Conceptual and methodological challenges. In N. Chitty, L. Ji, & G. D. Rawnsley (Eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Soft Power (2nd ed., pp. 80-98). Routledge.

Lisowska, M. (2025). Public diplomacy as exemplified by Republic of Korea undertakings in Poland [Unpublished master’s thesis, supervised by J. Barlik]. University of Warsaw.

Melissen, J. (Ed.). (2005). The new public diplomacy: Soft power in international relations. Palgrave Macmillan.

Melissen, J. (2011). Beyond the new public diplomacy. Clingendael Papers in Diplomacy, Paper no. 3, 1-28.

Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. PublicAffairs.

Nye, J. S. (2011). The Future of Power. PublicAffairs.

Ordeix-Rigo, E., & Duarte, J. (2009). From public diplomacy to corporate diplomacy. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(4), 549-564.

Signitzer, B., & Coombs, T. (1992). Public relations and public diplomacy: Conceptual convergences. Public Relations Review, 18(2), 137-147.

Szondi, G. (2008). Public diplomacy and nation branding: Conceptual similarities and differences. Netherlands Institute of International Relations, Clingendael, 1-42.

Vuving, A. L. (2009). How soft power works. American Political Science Association Annual Meeting Papers, 1-31.

World Bank. (n.d.). World development indicators. Retrieved from https://data.worldbank.org

World Intellectual Property Organization. (2024). Global Innovation Index 2024. WIPO.

Zaharna, R. S. (2010). Communication, culture, and identity in public diplomacy. In Battles to Bridges. Studies in Diplomacy and International Relations. Palgrave Macmillan.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-30

How to Cite

Public Diplomacy by Korean Entities in Poland: Governmental and Corporate Actors, Soft Power, and Public Perception. (2025). Media Dialogues, 18(1), 43-59. https://media-dialogues.com/index.php/ojs/article/view/144